Feuerbach vs C.S. Lewis

The human race is controlled by the desire to do what is unspoiled. fume result consistently defend their actions by arguing that those actions do non really contradict a underlying exemplar of behavior, or they will say that they violated their standards for sincere reasons. save they ceaselessly tend to say that these things that we do can be explained. When we set down making excuses for our actions then we do non pure tone good some what we sustain done. In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis discusses the design norms that multitude appeal to and by which they expect others to also erect by. Lewis claims that although everyone knows about the law, everyone breaks it. He further claims that something or somebody is croup this basic law. This obvious principle of behavior is not created by humans, that it is for humans to obey. Different people use divers(prenominal) labels for this law, such as traditional morality, moral law, the knowledge of right and wro ng, or virtue. C.S. Lewis calls it the native Law. Feuerbach was an early prominent atheistic philosopher. He denied all supernaturalism and attributed all blabber about beau humorl to talk about nature. He express that man is not drug-addicted on God, man is dependent on nature.

Feuerbach said that the idea of God arose as a result of men desiring to have some sort of supernatural Being as an chronicle for their own existence and the events that they observe around them. He claims that this desire is the seed from which the God-myth grew and that his hypothesis proves that God actually did not exist. The by-line paper will outline the contrasting arguments and viewpoints of L ewis and Feuerbach. I will use examples fro! m C.S. Lewis Mere Christianity as well as Feuerbachs bone marrow of Religion in order to... If you want to know a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay